|
課程名稱 |
儒家倫理學研究英文著作選讀
Selected Readings in Confucian Ethics |
|
開課學期 |
112-2 |
|
授課對象 |
文學院 哲學研究所 |
|
授課教師 |
徐乃義 |
|
課號 |
Phl7170 |
|
課程識別碼 |
124 M6990 |
|
班次 |
|
|
學分 |
3.0 |
|
全/半年 |
半年 |
|
必/選修 |
選修 |
|
上課時間 |
星期三7,8,9(14:20~17:20) |
|
上課地點 |
哲研討室一 |
|
備註 |
本課程中文授課,使用英文教科書。研究所：儒家領域。
總人數上限：15人 |
|
|
|
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
|
課程大綱
|
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
|
課程概述 |
藉由閱讀相關的著作，本課程帶領同學逐步熟悉當代英文學術世界中儒家倫理學的幾種主要研究典範，包括道德普遍主義(moral universalism)、德性倫理學(virtue ethics)、角色倫理學(role ethics)、楷模倫理學(exemplarism)、以及關懷倫理學(care ethics)等五個主要取徑，以及相關的論辯。主要目的，在引領同學去思考儒家倫理學具有的特質，試圖回答這樣一個基本卻又困難的核心問題：「儒家倫理學到底是什麼？」(What is Confucian Ethics?) 藉由邀請同學對此問題進行思考，本課程試圖開拓同學的研究視野，銜接上國際學術研究的較新動態，然後再以此為基礎，幫助同學發展出關於儒家倫理學的新問題意識。 |
|
課程目標 |
修課的同學將能夠：
1. 清楚了解當代英文世界中儒家倫理學研究的新動態。
2. 以該研究動態為參照，省視、調整自身研究的定位、方法，與方向。
3. 逐步且確實地精進英文學術閱讀能力。 |
|
課程要求 |
1. 仔細閱讀每週材料。
2. 積極參與課堂討論。
3. 期末報告。 |
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
|
Office Hours |
每週三 10:00~12:00 備註： 水源校區哲學系館515室; 也可另約時間 |
|
指定閱讀 |
|
|
參考書目 |
*以下為暫定書單，會再依實際修課情形進行調整。
1. Ames, Roger T. Confucian Role Ethics: A Vocabulary. Albany: SUNY Press, 2010.
2. Angle, Stephen. “Can Artificial Intelligence Lead Us to Genuine Virtue” In Intelligence and Wisdom: Artificial Intelligence Meets Chinese Philosophers, edited by Song Bing, 49-64. Singapore: Springer, 2021.
3. Angle, Stephen. “Pragmatic Problems with Confucian Role Ethics.” In Appreciating the Chinese Difference: Engaging Roger T. Ames on Methods, Issues, and Roles, edited by James Behuniak, 159-182. Albany: SUNY Press, 2018.
4. Bai, Tongdong. “A Confucian Version of Hybrid Regime: How Does It Work, and Why Is It Superior?” In The East Asian Challenge for Democracy: Political Meritocracy in Comparative Perspective, edited by Daniel Bell and Chenyang Li, 55-87. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
5. Chen, Lai. “Virtue Ethics and Confucian Ethics.” In Virtue Ethics and Confucianism, edited Stephen Angle and Michael Slote, 15-27. New York: Routledge, 2013.
6. Connolly, Tim. “Virtues and Roles in Early Confucian Ethics.” Confluence 4 (2016): 272-284.
7. Cottine, Cheryl. “Role Modeling in an Early Confucian Context.” Journal of Value Inquiry 50.4 (2016): 797-819.
8. Herr, Ranjoo Seodu. “Is Confucianism Compatible with Care Ethics? A Critique.” Philosophy East and West 53.4 (2003): 471-489.
9. Hourdequin, Marion & Wong, David B. “A Relational Approach to Environmental Ethics.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 32.1 (2005): 19–33.
10. Ivanhoe, P. J. “Early Confucianism and Environmental Ethics.” In Confucianism and Ecology: The Interrelation of Heaven, Earth, and Humans, edited by John Berthrong and Mary Evelyn Tucker, 59-76. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.
11. Ivanhoe, P. J. “Virtue Ethics and the Chinese Confucian Tradition.” In Virtue Ethics and Confucianism, edited Stephen Angle and Michael Slote, 28-46. New York: Routledge, 2013.
12. Kim, Sungmoon. “To Become a Confucian Democratic Citizen: Against Meritocratic Elitism.” British Journal of Political Science 43.3 (2008): 579-599.
13. Lai, Yu-Yi & Lai, Karyn. “Learning from Exemplars in Confucius’ Analects: The Centrality of Reflective Observation.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 55.7(2023): 797-808.
14. Lee, Ming-Huei. “Confucianism, Kant, and Virtue Ethics.” In Virtue Ethics and Confucianism, edited Stephen Angle and Michael Slote, 47-55. New York: Routledge, 2013.
15. Li, Chenyang. “The Artificial Intelligence Challenge and the End of Humanity.” Intelligence and Wisdom: Artificial Intelligence Meets Chinese Philosophers, edited by Song Bing, 33-47. Singapore: Springer, 2021.
16. Li, Chenyang. “The Confucian Concept of Jen and the Feminist Ethics of Care: A Comparative Study.” In The Sage and the Second Sex: Confucianism, Ethics, and Gender, edited by Li Chenyang, 23-42. Chicago: Open Court, 2000.
17. McLeod, Alexus. The Dao of Madness: Mental Illness and Self-Cultivation in Early Chinese Philosophy and Medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.
18. Ni, Peimin. “Reflections on Ames-Rosemont Role Ethics.” In Appreciating the Chinese Difference: Engaging Roger T. Ames on Methods, Issues, and Roles, edited by James Behuniak, 183-202. Albany: SUNY Press, 2018.
19. Nuyen, Anh Tuan. “Confucian Role-Based Ethics and Strong Environmental Ethics.” Environmental Values 20.4 (2011): 549–66.
20. Olberding, Amy. Moral Exemplars in the Analects: The Good Person is That. N.Y.: Routledge: 2011.
21. Pang-White, Ann A. “Reconstructing Modern Ethics: Confucian Care ethics.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 36.2 (2009): 210-227.
22. Rosemont, Henry Jr. Against Individualism: A Confucian Rethinking of the Foundations of Morality, Politics, Family, and Religion. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2015
23. Star, Daniel. “Do Confucians Really Care? A Defense of the Distinctiveness of Care Ethics: A reply to Chenyang Li.” Hypatia 17.1 (2002): 77-106.
24. Wong, Wai-Ying. “Confucian Ethics and Virtue Ethics Revisited.” In Virtue Ethics and Confucianism, edited Stephen Angle and Michael Slote, 74-79. New York: Routledge, 2013.
25. Xiao, Yang. “Why Confucianism is Not a Virtue Ethics.”Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) , 52.3 (2020): 47-57. |
|
評量方式
(僅供參考) |
|
No. |
項目 |
百分比 |
說明 |
|
1. |
每週寫作 |
40% |
|
2. |
期末報告 |
60% |
|
|
|
針對學生困難提供學生調整方式 |
|
上課形式 |
提供學生彈性出席課程方式 |
|
作業繳交方式 |
延長作業繳交期限, 學生與授課老師協議改以其他形式呈現 |
|
考試形式 |
延後期末考試日期(時間) |
|
其他 |
由師生雙方議定 |
|
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
|
第1週 |
2/21 |
Introduction |
|
第2週 |
2/28 |
No Class this Week (228 Peace Memorial Day) |
|
第3週 |
3/6 |
The Universalist Approach (I) |
|
第4週 |
3/13 |
The Universalist Approach (II) |
|
第5週 |
3/20 |
The Virtue Ethics Approach (I) |
|
第6週 |
3/27 |
The Virtue Ethics Approach (II) |
|
第7週 |
4/3 |
The Virtue Ethics Approach (III) |
|
第8週 |
4/10 |
The Role Ethics Approach (I) |
|
第9週 |
4/17 |
The Role Ethics Approach (II) |
|
第10週 |
4/24 |
The Role Ethics Approach (III) |
|
第11週 |
5/1 |
The Exemplarist Approach (I) |
|
第12週 |
5/8 |
The Exemplarist Approach (II) |
|
第13週 |
5/15 |
The Care Ethics Approach (I) |
|
第14週 |
5/22 |
The Care Ethics Approach (II) |
|
第15週 |
5/29 |
No Class this Week (Instructor Attending Conference) |
|
第16週 |
6/5 |
Student Presentations |
|